Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States.
Identifieur interne : 000767 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000766; suivant : 000768Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States.
Auteurs : Eva-Maria Gamper [Autriche] ; Bernhard Holzner [Autriche] ; Madeleine T. King [Australie] ; Richard Norman [Australie] ; Rosalie Viney [Australie] ; Virginie Nerich [France] ; Georg Kemmler [Autriche]Source :
- Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research [ 1524-4733 ] ; 2018.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Comportement de choix (MeSH), Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH), Femelle (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Mâle (MeSH), Psychométrie (instrumentation), Psychométrie (méthodes), Psychométrie (normes), Qualité de vie (psychologie), Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH), Tumeurs (psychologie).
- MESH :
- méthodes : Psychométrie.
- normes : Psychométrie.
- psychologie : Qualité de vie, Tumeurs.
- instrumentation : Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Comportement de choix, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Femelle, Humains, Mâle, Psychométrie, Reproductibilité des résultats.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult (MeSH), Choice Behavior (MeSH), Female (MeSH), Humans (MeSH), Male (MeSH), Middle Aged (MeSH), Neoplasms (psychology), Psychometrics (instrumentation), Psychometrics (methods), Psychometrics (standards), Quality of Life (psychology), Reproducibility of Results (MeSH), Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH).
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Psychometrics.
- methods : Psychometrics.
- psychology : Neoplasms, Quality of Life.
- standards : Psychometrics.
- Adult, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Recently, a newly developed cancer-specific multiattribute utility instrument based on the widely used health-related quality of life instrument, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, was introduced: the QLU-C10D. For the elicitation of utility weights, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed. Our aim was to investigate the DCE in terms of individual choice consistency and utility estimate consistency by applying a test-retest design.
METHODS
We conducted the study in general population samples in Germany and France. The DCE was administered via a web-based self-complete survey using online panels. Respondents were presented 16 choice sets comprising 11 attributes with 4 levels each. Retest was conducted 4 to 6 weeks after first assessment. We used kappa and percentage agreement as measures of choice consistency and both intraclass correlations and mean utility differences as measures of utility estimate consistency.
RESULTS
A total of 300 German respondents (31% female, mean age 48 years [SD 14]) and 305 French respondents (46% female, mean age 47 years [SD 16]) completed test and retest assessments. Individual choice consistency was moderate to high (Germany: κ = 0.605, percentage agreement = 80.2%; France: κ = 0.411, percentage agreement = 70.6%). Utility estimate consistency was high when considering intraclass correlations (all >0.79). Mean utility differences were 0.08 in the German sample and 0.05 in the French sample.
CONCLUSIONS
Results indicate that the designed DCE elicits stable health state preferences rather than guesses or mood-specific or condition-specific judgments. Nevertheless, the identified mean utility differences between test and retest need to be taken into account when determining minimal important differences for the QLU-C10D in future research.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.012
PubMed: 30098674
Affiliations:
- Australie, Autriche, France
- Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Franche-Comté, Nouvelle-Galles du Sud, Tyrol (Land)
- Besançon, Innsbruck, Sydney
- Université de Sydney, Université de médecine d'Innsbruck
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States.</title><author><name sortKey="Gamper, Eva Maria" sort="Gamper, Eva Maria" uniqKey="Gamper E" first="Eva-Maria" last="Gamper">Eva-Maria Gamper</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: eva-maria.gamper@i-med.ac.at.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Autriche</country><wicri:regionArea>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de médecine d'Innsbruck</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Innsbruck</settlement><region nuts="2" type="region">Tyrol (Land)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Holzner, Bernhard" sort="Holzner, Bernhard" uniqKey="Holzner B" first="Bernhard" last="Holzner">Bernhard Holzner</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Autriche</country><wicri:regionArea>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de médecine d'Innsbruck</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Innsbruck</settlement><region nuts="2" type="region">Tyrol (Land)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="King, Madeleine T" sort="King, Madeleine T" uniqKey="King M" first="Madeleine T" last="King">Madeleine T. King</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, Cancer Australia Chair in Cancer Quality of Life School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, Cancer Australia Chair in Cancer Quality of Life School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sydney</settlement><region type="état">Nouvelle-Galles du Sud</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Sydney</orgName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Norman, Richard" sort="Norman, Richard" uniqKey="Norman R" first="Richard" last="Norman">Richard Norman</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Curtin University, Perth</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Perth</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Viney, Rosalie" sort="Viney, Rosalie" uniqKey="Viney R" first="Rosalie" last="Viney">Rosalie Viney</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Center of Health Economics and Research Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Center of Health Economics and Research Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sydney</settlement><region type="état">Nouvelle-Galles du Sud</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nerich, Virginie" sort="Nerich, Virginie" uniqKey="Nerich V" first="Virginie" last="Nerich">Virginie Nerich</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Franche-Comté, Besançon</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</region><region type="old region">Franche-Comté</region><settlement type="city">Besançon</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kemmler, Georg" sort="Kemmler, Georg" uniqKey="Kemmler G" first="Georg" last="Kemmler">Georg Kemmler</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Autriche</country><wicri:regionArea>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de médecine d'Innsbruck</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Innsbruck</settlement><region nuts="2" type="region">Tyrol (Land)</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2018">2018</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:30098674</idno><idno type="pmid">30098674</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.012</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000749</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000749</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000749</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000749</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000749</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States.</title><author><name sortKey="Gamper, Eva Maria" sort="Gamper, Eva Maria" uniqKey="Gamper E" first="Eva-Maria" last="Gamper">Eva-Maria Gamper</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: eva-maria.gamper@i-med.ac.at.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Autriche</country><wicri:regionArea>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de médecine d'Innsbruck</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Innsbruck</settlement><region nuts="2" type="region">Tyrol (Land)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Holzner, Bernhard" sort="Holzner, Bernhard" uniqKey="Holzner B" first="Bernhard" last="Holzner">Bernhard Holzner</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Autriche</country><wicri:regionArea>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de médecine d'Innsbruck</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Innsbruck</settlement><region nuts="2" type="region">Tyrol (Land)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="King, Madeleine T" sort="King, Madeleine T" uniqKey="King M" first="Madeleine T" last="King">Madeleine T. King</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, Cancer Australia Chair in Cancer Quality of Life School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, Cancer Australia Chair in Cancer Quality of Life School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sydney</settlement><region type="état">Nouvelle-Galles du Sud</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Sydney</orgName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Norman, Richard" sort="Norman, Richard" uniqKey="Norman R" first="Richard" last="Norman">Richard Norman</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Curtin University, Perth</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Perth</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Viney, Rosalie" sort="Viney, Rosalie" uniqKey="Viney R" first="Rosalie" last="Viney">Rosalie Viney</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Center of Health Economics and Research Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Center of Health Economics and Research Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sydney</settlement><region type="état">Nouvelle-Galles du Sud</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nerich, Virginie" sort="Nerich, Virginie" uniqKey="Nerich V" first="Virginie" last="Nerich">Virginie Nerich</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Franche-Comté, Besançon</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</region><region type="old region">Franche-Comté</region><settlement type="city">Besançon</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kemmler, Georg" sort="Kemmler, Georg" uniqKey="Kemmler G" first="Georg" last="Kemmler">Georg Kemmler</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Autriche</country><wicri:regionArea>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de médecine d'Innsbruck</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Innsbruck</settlement><region nuts="2" type="region">Tyrol (Land)</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research</title><idno type="eISSN">1524-4733</idno><imprint><date when="2018" type="published">2018</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Choice Behavior (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Neoplasms (psychology)</term><term>Psychometrics (instrumentation)</term><term>Psychometrics (methods)</term><term>Psychometrics (standards)</term><term>Quality of Life (psychology)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results (MeSH)</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Comportement de choix (MeSH)</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Psychométrie (instrumentation)</term><term>Psychométrie (méthodes)</term><term>Psychométrie (normes)</term><term>Qualité de vie (psychologie)</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH)</term><term>Tumeurs (psychologie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Psychometrics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Psychometrics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Psychométrie</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Psychométrie</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Qualité de vie</term><term>Tumeurs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Neoplasms</term><term>Quality of Life</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Psychometrics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Choice Behavior</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Comportement de choix</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Psychométrie</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Recently, a newly developed cancer-specific multiattribute utility instrument based on the widely used health-related quality of life instrument, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, was introduced: the QLU-C10D. For the elicitation of utility weights, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed. Our aim was to investigate the DCE in terms of individual choice consistency and utility estimate consistency by applying a test-retest design.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>We conducted the study in general population samples in Germany and France. The DCE was administered via a web-based self-complete survey using online panels. Respondents were presented 16 choice sets comprising 11 attributes with 4 levels each. Retest was conducted 4 to 6 weeks after first assessment. We used kappa and percentage agreement as measures of choice consistency and both intraclass correlations and mean utility differences as measures of utility estimate consistency.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>A total of 300 German respondents (31% female, mean age 48 years [SD 14]) and 305 French respondents (46% female, mean age 47 years [SD 16]) completed test and retest assessments. Individual choice consistency was moderate to high (Germany: κ = 0.605, percentage agreement = 80.2%; France: κ = 0.411, percentage agreement = 70.6%). Utility estimate consistency was high when considering intraclass correlations (all >0.79). Mean utility differences were 0.08 in the German sample and 0.05 in the French sample.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>Results indicate that the designed DCE elicits stable health state preferences rather than guesses or mood-specific or condition-specific judgments. Nevertheless, the identified mean utility differences between test and retest need to be taken into account when determining minimal important differences for the QLU-C10D in future research.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">30098674</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2018</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>25</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1524-4733</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>21</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2018</Year><Month>08</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Value Health</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>958-966</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S1098-3015(18)30192-X</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.012</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND">Recently, a newly developed cancer-specific multiattribute utility instrument based on the widely used health-related quality of life instrument, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, was introduced: the QLU-C10D. For the elicitation of utility weights, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed. Our aim was to investigate the DCE in terms of individual choice consistency and utility estimate consistency by applying a test-retest design.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS">We conducted the study in general population samples in Germany and France. The DCE was administered via a web-based self-complete survey using online panels. Respondents were presented 16 choice sets comprising 11 attributes with 4 levels each. Retest was conducted 4 to 6 weeks after first assessment. We used kappa and percentage agreement as measures of choice consistency and both intraclass correlations and mean utility differences as measures of utility estimate consistency.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS">A total of 300 German respondents (31% female, mean age 48 years [SD 14]) and 305 French respondents (46% female, mean age 47 years [SD 16]) completed test and retest assessments. Individual choice consistency was moderate to high (Germany: κ = 0.605, percentage agreement = 80.2%; France: κ = 0.411, percentage agreement = 70.6%). Utility estimate consistency was high when considering intraclass correlations (all >0.79). Mean utility differences were 0.08 in the German sample and 0.05 in the French sample.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS">Results indicate that the designed DCE elicits stable health state preferences rather than guesses or mood-specific or condition-specific judgments. Nevertheless, the identified mean utility differences between test and retest need to be taken into account when determining minimal important differences for the QLU-C10D in future research.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gamper</LastName><ForeName>Eva-Maria</ForeName><Initials>EM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: eva-maria.gamper@i-med.ac.at.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Holzner</LastName><ForeName>Bernhard</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>King</LastName><ForeName>Madeleine T</ForeName><Initials>MT</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, Cancer Australia Chair in Cancer Quality of Life School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Norman</LastName><ForeName>Richard</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Viney</LastName><ForeName>Rosalie</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Center of Health Economics and Research Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nerich</LastName><ForeName>Virginie</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kemmler</LastName><ForeName>Georg</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2018</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>03</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Value Health</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100883818</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1098-3015</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002755" MajorTopicYN="Y">Choice Behavior</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009369" MajorTopicYN="N">Neoplasms</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011594" MajorTopicYN="N">Psychometrics</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011788" MajorTopicYN="N">Quality of Life</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">QLU-C10D</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">choice consistency</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">health state valuation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">test-retest</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">utilities</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2017</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>12</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2017</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2017</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2018</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2018</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2018</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30098674</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1098-3015(18)30192-X</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.012</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li><li>Autriche</li><li>France</li></country><region><li>Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</li><li>Franche-Comté</li><li>Nouvelle-Galles du Sud</li><li>Tyrol (Land)</li></region><settlement><li>Besançon</li><li>Innsbruck</li><li>Sydney</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Sydney</li><li>Université de médecine d'Innsbruck</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Autriche"><region name="Tyrol (Land)"><name sortKey="Gamper, Eva Maria" sort="Gamper, Eva Maria" uniqKey="Gamper E" first="Eva-Maria" last="Gamper">Eva-Maria Gamper</name></region><name sortKey="Holzner, Bernhard" sort="Holzner, Bernhard" uniqKey="Holzner B" first="Bernhard" last="Holzner">Bernhard Holzner</name><name sortKey="Kemmler, Georg" sort="Kemmler, Georg" uniqKey="Kemmler G" first="Georg" last="Kemmler">Georg Kemmler</name></country><country name="Australie"><region name="Nouvelle-Galles du Sud"><name sortKey="King, Madeleine T" sort="King, Madeleine T" uniqKey="King M" first="Madeleine T" last="King">Madeleine T. King</name></region><name sortKey="Norman, Richard" sort="Norman, Richard" uniqKey="Norman R" first="Richard" last="Norman">Richard Norman</name><name sortKey="Viney, Rosalie" sort="Viney, Rosalie" uniqKey="Viney R" first="Rosalie" last="Viney">Rosalie Viney</name></country><country name="France"><region name="Bourgogne-Franche-Comté"><name sortKey="Nerich, Virginie" sort="Nerich, Virginie" uniqKey="Nerich V" first="Virginie" last="Nerich">Virginie Nerich</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/AutomedicationFrancoV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000767 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000767 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= AutomedicationFrancoV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:30098674
|texte= Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:30098674" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AutomedicationFrancoV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |